Pabila Dr Rozmey senyum sengih depan kemera..

Hohohoooe. Sengal! Sakit jiwa bila tengok video klip perutusan "raya" Pemegang mohor besar Raja-raja Melayu by Dr Rozmey ni.. Daripada ada selera nak pergi tengok (gulp) terus rasa kenyang nak terjeluak pula.

Filem ni memang dah banyak dah buat kontroversi negara. Daripada kes sebelum produksi, poster movie sampailah ke kutipan yang mula-mula dulu agak-agak dapat 12 juta ja, sekarang dah naik jadi 40 juta pula.

Serius gua tak tahulah berapa jah yang mampu dia kutip nanti. Tengok daripada segi kualiti--rasa cam nak gi tengok filem indie jah lagi puas hati. Wallahualam~~ Pepandailah korang buat keputusan. Bukannya you alls tibai korek duit gua kan?!

Saksikan Abang Rozmey idaman kalbu selepas ini! WOHA

SRi: “berbesar hati mewartakan & memuktamadkan tarikh tayangan filem 2 Alam serentak ke 83 pawagam seluruh negara 18 November 2010 bersamaan dengan 11 Zulhijjah…” *wajib nonton nih! Filem pertama tayang di semua pawagam kat Malaysia ni! Dah laa gambar bini dia besar gabang kat Pekat Jitra nue. WOHAHAHHAA
SRi:Tahniah kepada 62,141 manusia yang berjaya memenuhi segenap sudut Litar Sepang hari ni! Tapi apsal gua rasa cam beliau nyanyi tak reti sebut R? "L"aja kita... Pelat eyh? isk isk isk

101010

Tahniah diucapkan bagi mereka yang melangsungkan upacara walimatururus esok hari! Amboi.. Makin ramai ya yang dah mulai menjejak langkah ke alam rumahtangga ni pada usia muda. Bagus. Bagus.

Abang Angkasawan pun esok juga nak kawen ngan buah hatinya. Suka betul SRi layan gambar-gambar pre-wedding mereka. Memang betul-betul ala-ala angkasa gitu!

Papehal TAHNIAH kepada semua pasangan mempelai. Semoga kekal bahagia sampai ke akhir hayat!!

CONGRATULATION!!!

SRi: Minta maaf sebab tak dapat memenuhi jemputan teman-teman yang melangsungkan majlis kebahagiaan esok hari.

SRi:Sory juga kepada hamba Allah yang sorang tu yang ngajak pegi layan motoGP kat Sepang nue.

SRi:Waa!!Pandai betul orang-orang Jepun ni pilih time nak buat Qualify F1 esok. 10 pagi@101010. I Looike~

SRi:Tabik spring dengan kak engku yang memang cool habish setia tetiap pagi kat Sinar 

Farid!!Hantar balik NEO ekaw.

Kepada semua pemilik kereta Proton Gen2 dan Satria Neo yang dikeluarkan dari tahun 2004 sehingga 2008, dimaklumkan bahawa Proton telah memanggil semula semua unit kereta tersebut untuk pemeriksaan dan pembaikan. Kerosakan yang dikesan melibatkan komponen ‘clock spring’ yang mungkin boleh menjejaskan keselamatan. Menurut Pengarah Urusan Kumpulan Proton, Datuk Syed Zainal Abidin Syed Mohamed Tahir, komponen terbabit menyambungkan beberapa suis dan beg udara kepada peralatan seperti radio, hon dan kawalan ‘cruise’.

Kerosakan pada ‘clock spring’ menyebabkan bunyi geseran dalam stereng, hon berbunyi atau lampu kereta terpasang sendiri, kerosakan suis kawalan audio dan dalam kes lebih serius boleh menyebabkan pelepasan beg udara di bahagian pemandu. Panggilan semula unit kereta tersebut dilakukan secara sukarela dan ianya adalah sebahagian daripada jaminan kualiti global PROTON membabitkan 15,911 unit atau dua peratus daripada 660,000 unit kereta yang dikeluarkan dan dijual dalam tempoh berkenaan.

Semua kos pembaikan kerosakan tersebut di mana-mana pusat servis Proton yang sah adalah percuma dan tidak akan dikenakan sebarang cas. Proton menasihati semua pemilik kenderaan yang terbabit supaya membuat temujanji bagi mendapatkan pemeriksaan secara percuma. Selain itu, Proton juga akan menghantar surat kepada pelanggan yang terbabit untuk memaklumkan mereka mengenai perkara itu. Pada masa yang sama, Proton telah mewujudkan laman web khusus, www.protonaftersales.com untuk membantu pelanggan menyemak tahun pengeluaran kenderaan masing-masing.

Dalam satu kenyataan semalam, Syed Zainal bagi pihak Proton berkata meskipun bilangan kenderaan yang terbabit adalah kecil, keselamatan pelanggan adalah sangat penting dan mereka memohon maaf berikutan masalah yang berlaku. Beliau berharap pelanggan memahami bahawa panggilan semula itu perlu untuk memastikan keyakinan berterusan terhadap keselamatan dan prestasi kenderaan keluaran mereka.

Sumber : Disunting daripada Berita Harian, 8 Oktober 2010

SRi : Nampaknya Proton juga tidak terlepas dari masalah kerosakan kenderaan mereka. Sebelum ini dunia automotif dikejutkan dengan masalah kenderaan buatan Toyota di Amerika Syarikat yang melibatkan panggilan balik atau ‘recall’ yang melibatkan jumlah kenderaan yang cukup besar. Kos yang ditanggung oleh Toyota untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut juga bukannya kecil, malah terpaksa menanggung impak kejatuhan imej yang teruk. Selepas itu banyak lagi syarikat automotif lain yang terpaksa memanggil semula kenderaan masing-masing akibat kerosakan yang dikesan.

Kepada Proton, saya mengucapkan tahniah kerana berani mengambil tindakan memanggil semula kenderaan yang terlibat. Proton pasti menanggung kos yang tinggi untuk pembaikan tersebut namun itulah harga yang perlu dibayar oleh Proton untuk mendapat kepercayaan pelanggan. Mungkin ini dasar baru Proton untuk membina keyakinan terhadap kenderaan keluaran mereka dan dasar tersebut amatlah dialu-alukan. Bukan mudah untuk membina kepercayaan dan kesetiaan pelanggan, namun tindakan Proton kali ini adalah bijak.

Tidak guna menyembunyikan masalah yang berlaku jika keselamatan pelanggan menjadi taruhan. Saya sukakan perkataan ‘panggilan balik’ atau ‘recall’ yang digunakan Proton, ini membuktikan Proton telus dalam memberitahu rakyat Malaysia dan pelanggan tentang apa yang berlaku. Kepada semua pemilik Proton Gen2 dan Satria Neo yang terlibat, sila ke pusat servis Proton dengan segera untuk mendapatkan pemeriksaan dan pembaikan percuma, cas tidak dikenakan.

WAJA Baru! WOHA

Peminat-peminat dunia permotoran pastinya teruja dengan kehadiran Proton Waja baru yang di’rebadge dari model Lancer Mitsubishi. Reka bentuknya yang menarik dan ruang penumpang yang luas mungkin antara faktor yang menarik minat pembeli di luar sana. Proton Waja baru ini juga dijangka akan meningkatkan kembali momentum jualan kenderaan Proton di Malaysia. Mungkin juga model ini akan memberi saingan sengit kepada model Toyota Vios, Honda City, Kia Forte, Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic dan Nissan Sylphy.

 

Proton Waja baru: pandangan belakang

Proton Waja baru: pandangan depan

Kredit: ohmalaysia.com

SRi:Nak kejar nombor plat WWW

Proton VS AirAsia

Tentu ada diantara kita yang masih tertanya-tanya apa sebenarnya yang berlaku antara Proton bersama-sama Group Lotus dan Tony Fernandes yang baru saja menubuhkan Team Lotus. Pertikaian antara Proton-Group Lotus dan Tony Fernandes-Team Lotus nampaknya begitu serius sekali sehingga kemuncaknya perbalahan itu telah dibawa sehingga ke peringkat mahkamah. Tony Fernandes dan Team Lotus Ventures Ltd telah memfailkan tuntutan di Mahkamah Tinggi British untuk mendapatkan hak penggunaan nama Lotus dan semua yang berkaitan dengan Formula Satu.

Sebelum itu Proton telah mengeluarkan kenyataan bahawa Tony Fernandes serta Team Lotus tidak berhak menggunakan sebarang jenama Lotus dalam apa-apa urusan mereka selepas ini, terutama sekali penggunaan nama Lotus dalam sukan Formula 1 melalui Team Lotus yang ditubuhkan oleh Tony Fernandes dan rakan-rakan perniagaannya. Arahan dari Proton tersebut dapat difahami kerana Lotus adalah hak mutlak Proton dan pihak-pihak lain tidak mempunyai sebarang hak untuk menggunakan jenama Proton tanpa sebarang kebenaran. Namun Tony dan Team Lotus mempunyai alasan tersendiri mengapa mereka masih berhak menggunakan jenama Lotus dan kini mereka mahu Mahkamah Tinggi British yang membuat keputusan.

Situasi yang kurang baik seperti ini nampaknya tidak memberikan impak yang baik kepada kedua-dua pihak, apatah lagi kedua-duanya adalah syarikat dari Malaysia yang mempunyai tujuan yang sama iaitu mengangkat nama Malaysia di persada dunia melalui sukan Formula 1. Secara peribadi saya berpendapat Proton dan Tony serta Team Lotus perlu duduk berbincang dan mencapai persetujuan di luar mahkamah bagi menamatkan perbalahan yang timbul. Dalam situasi seperti ini saya mengambil keputusan untuk menyokong tindakan Proton dan buat Tony, anda patut lebih menghormati Proton sebelum membuat keputusan berkenaan jenama Lotus. Hakikat yang tidak dapat disembunyikan dan seluruh dunia sedia maklum, hanya ada satu Lotus. Dan ianya adalah milik Group Lotus, anak syarikat Proton.

Kesilapan Tony ialah apabila beliau membuat keputusan menubuhkan Team Lotus setelah membeli jenama tersebut dari pemilik asal David Hunt, tanpa merujuk terlebih dahulu kepada Proton dan Group Lotus. Atau mungkin ini caranya Tony dan rakan-rakannya berurusan kerana mereka sedari awal mengetahui keputusan mereka itu tidak mungkin akan mendapat restu dari Proton. Mungkin juga Tony dan Team Lotus telah bersedia dari segi undang-undang untuk merampas jenama Lotus dalam sukan Formula 1 dari Proton dan Group Lotus. Saya rasa pemikiran seorang ‘bussines man’ tentu berlainan daripada orang biasa, dan dengan wang yang banyak, kebanyakan ‘matlamat boleh menghalalkan cara’.

Walau bagaimanapun saya mengharapkan Team Lotus dapat beraksi dalam Formula 1 pada tahun hadapan, tetapi ianya hanya akan berlaku sama ada dengan kebenaran Proton atau keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi British yang memberikan kemenangan kepada Tony dan Team Lotus. Adalah lebih bijak jika Tony membuka ruang kepada Proton untuk memiliki kepentingan di dalam Team LotusVentures Ltd sekurang-kurangnya 51 peratus. Tetapi taikun perniagaan bergelar jutawan seperti Tony dan rakan-rakannya dari Kumpulan Tune dan kumpulan Naza yang diwakili oleh SM Nasarudin sudah tentu tidak rela Team Lotus dikuasai oleh Proton. Sekarang biarlah Mahkamah Tinggi British yang membuat keputusan. Saya yakin Proton dan Group Lotus akan memenangi pertikaian tersebut.

Berikut ialah kenyataan rasmi dari Proton berkenaan penamatan hak penggunaan jenama Lotus terhadap Tony Fernandes dan Team Lotus Ventures Ltd;

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PROTON’S CLARIFICATION ON THE PURCHASE OF “LOTUS” BRAND BY TONY FERNANDES

Kuala Lumpur, 27 September 2010 – There is and always has been only one Lotus, the Lotus started by Colin Chapman. From the beginning Lotus made road cars and raced racing cars. Until 1994, Group Lotus, the road car manufacturer and Team Lotus, which operated the Formula 1 team, were in common ownership with common directors. In 1994, Team Lotus failed and Lotus has not raced since. Since 1994, David Hunt has claimed to have acquired assets of Team Lotus, including its name, from the liquidator. He has never raced as Lotus. Mr. Hunt’s attempt to acquire the name Team Lotus was ineffective. Group Lotus is the owner of all rights in the “Lotus” automotive brand including those relating to Formula 1.

Last year, Tony Fernandes and 1 Malaysia Racing Team recognised this by taking a licence from Group Lotus to use the “Lotus” brand for the “Lotus Racing” team in the current Formula 1 season. With PROTON’s agreement, Group Lotus has now terminated its licence to 1 Malaysia Racing Team to use the “Lotus Racing” brand in the 2011 and future Formula 1 seasons as a result of the flagrant and persistent breaches of the licence by 1 Malaysia Racing Team, which were damaging to the “Lotus” brand.

Following that termination, neither 1 Malaysia Racing Team, nor any other company associated with Mr. Fernandes such as Tune Group Sdn Bhd or Team Lotus Ventures Limited, has the authority of Group Lotus to use any “Lotus” brand in the 2011 Formula 1 season. This includes the use of the brand “Team Lotus”.

Group Lotus understands that Mr. Fernandes intends to rebrand the current “Lotus Racing” Formula 1 team to “Team Lotus” for the 2011 Formula 1 season. Mr. Fernandes indicates that Tune Group has acquired the rights to the name “Team Lotus” from a business formerly owned by David Hunt called Team Lotus Ventures Limited. Group Lotus believes these rights to have no proper legal foundation, a fact of which Mr. Fernandes was well aware when his company purchased them.

PROTON will support Group Lotus in taking all necessary steps to protect its rights in the “Lotus” name, including resisting any attempts by Mr. Fernandes or his companies, or any other unauthorised person, to use the “Lotus” name in the 2011 Formula 1 season.

Dato’ Sri Mohd. Nadzmi Mohd. Salleh, Chairman of PROTON Holdings Berhad and Group Lotus commented, “We believe the Lotus brand to be one of the most valuable brands in Formula 1 today. We are the owners of this brand, and will take all necessary steps to protect it. Tony Fernandes has no rights to use the Lotus brand in the 2011 Formula 1 season, and we will strongly resist any attempts by him to use our brand without our permission and will withdraw our sponsorship of the Lotus Racing team.”

“To put it simply, Group Lotus is everything Lotus. The fact that 1 Malaysia Racing Team entered into an agreement with Group Lotus to use the brand means that both Mr. Fernandes and 1 Malaysia Racing Team recognises and acknowledges Group Lotus’ rights,” he added.

About PROTON

PROTON, established in 1983, is Malaysia’s largest manufacturer of automobiles, and the only full-fledged OEM car manufacturer in South-East Asia. With operations in key markets from UK to the Middle East, and across South-East Asia and Australasia, especially in countries like China and Iran, PROTON produces cars to suit a range of consumer demands and preferences.

Its offerings include versatile and reliable four-door family vehicles, two-door hatchbacks for the young-at-heart, luxurious and stylish executive sedans, spacious and affordable multi-purpose vehicles, as well as the world-renowned sports cars from Lotus. Most importantly, PROTON models are now developed with Lotus Engineering, offering customers superior ride and handling experience in every drive.

PROTON’s inception as a key driver of national development has seen the brand accelerate its learning curve through technology transfer with strategic partnerships and technical collaborations. By listening to the needs of customers, PROTON cars are now steadily on track to achieve the mission for the future, with PROTON set to become a marque which builds cars with passion and soul; cars that are a delight to drive – and a pleasure to own.

About Lotus

Group Lotus is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PROTON Holdings Berhad. The main operating subsidiary of Group Lotus plc is Lotus Cars Limited, which has two operating divisions – Lotus Engineering and Lotus Cars. Lotus Engineering is an internationally recognised automotive engineering consultancy based in Norfolk, UK. Global facilities include those in Michigan (USA), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), China and offices in Germany.

Lotus Engineering provides comprehensive and versatile consultancy services to many of the world’s OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers, offering a full engineering service from initial concept and project design through development and integration of the complete vehicle to meet all worldwide markets and customers to full production. This includes third party ‘niche vehicle’ engineering and manufacture worldwide.

Lotus Cars builds world class, prestige, high performance sports cars for sale in 37 countries. These include the iconic Lotus Elise, and the Exige and Europa. Lotus’ latest model, the Lotus Evora, goes on sale from Spring 2009. Lotus is a global high-tech company, expanding rapidly and committed to driving forward technology for both Lotus Cars and its Engineering clients, spearheading research into such areas as hybrids, electric cars and renewable fuels.

SRi:Lotus  Racing tahun depan lebih jantan dengan enjin Renault dan sistem hidraulik Red Bull.

Harga Sebuah Nyawa..

Ini adalah kisah yg aku dapat dari seorang kawan. Rasanya dah banyak kali kita dengar bagaimana pihak berkuasa kita bertindak dalam keadaan kecemasan. Kalau sesiapa pernah mendengar joke dari Harith Iskandar semasa beliau menjadi "stand-up comedian" di majlis-majlis tertentu pasti ada joke perbezaan bagaimana kisah 911 di US dan kemudiannya dijadikan kisah 999 di Malaysia.

Kita sering tenguk siri 911 atau ER atau sekarang NCSI bagaimana mereka bertindak begitu cepat menghantar paramedik tak kira lah samada yg cedera tu adalah penjahat atau polis. Mereka melihat nyawa sebagai sesuatu yg paling berharga. Sedangkan di Malaysia .. nyawa mcm barang yg boleh diganti.. tu sebab agaknya kita ada banyak mat rempit yg tak takut mati.

Seorang kawan bercerita ... seorang pelajar UPM yg dilanggar dibawa ke Hospital Besar KL, dalam keadaan kritikal, tapi jururawat di situ boleh berkata

biarkan.. padan muka .. ni mesti merempit ni

sedangkan pelajar tu dlm perjalanan balik dr kelas. Bagi aku tak kiralah orang tu rempit ke tidak, itu hal dia.. tanggungjawab mereka adalah menyelamatkan nyawa hatta nyawa penjahat sekali pun. Akhirnya pelajar UPM tahun ke3 tersebut meninggal dunia kerana terlambat diberi rawatan kecemasan.

Ntahlah... mungkin konsep kita bahawa ajal maut di tangan Allah... jadi adakalanya kita cuba justify tindakan kita dengan berkata begini

Dah ajal dia.. lambat ke cepat rawatan dia akan mati gak dah tertulis..

tapi tidak ke kita berasa lega kalau kita dah berupaya menyelamatkannya tapi dia meninggal dunia.. dr merasa kesal yg dia meninggal atas kelalaian kita?

Itu bab kakitangan hospital... bagaimana dengan org awam? Kelmarin dengar di KLFM.. seorang pemandu ambulan meminta orang ramai memberi laluan kerana mereka ingin cepat ke hospital utk menyelamatkan nyawa org yg kemalangan. Sedih mendengarnya... kenapalah tak pernah terfikir kalau-kalau yg dalam ambulan tu adalah sedara mara kita yg sedang menyabung nyawa?

Aku menulis ni sebab aku mendapat email dr seorang kawan.. kawan in meng"forward"kan cerita Zara Davies Abdul Rahman ... bagaimana kecewanya dia dengan kakitangan Hospital Klang.. dan beliau juga memberikan saranan bagaimana nyawa dpt diselamatkan dengan secepatnya.


A true blue Malaysia Boleh story

Zara Davies Abdul Rahman
Dec 15, 06 5:09pm
On Dec 13, at about 1.30pm, there was a road traffic accident involving a driver driving a dark blue Proton Saga and the victim, a highway road sweeper, male, approximately in the mid-20s. The location of the accident was about 150 – 200 meters from the Batu Tiga toll booth (Elite highway) in the direction towards KLIA.

I chanced upon this accident (which had just happened) while on my way back to work from Ampang via the Kesas highway. As I approached the accident site, it seemed the victim was already dead, the driver who had knocked him down was standing nearby and nobody dared approach to lend assistance to the victim - almost as if this was one time were an invasion of privacy was taboo.

I stopped my vehicle and approached and upon examining the accident victim, I found him to be still alive but heavily concussed, his pupils were completely dilated. Suddenly the victim grabbed my hand and tried with all his might to raise himself to his feet. I tried to calm him and asked the bystanders if an ambulance had been called. I was told it had not.

In a firm tone, I told the driver of the car that hit the victim to call for an ambulance. He dialed 999, it rang until it didn’t ring anymore. He rang again, again it was not answered. He rang again and passed the phone to me. Finally someone answered (a man).

I informed him that I was reporting an accident a few hundred meters away from the Batu Tiga toll in the direction of KLIA. He asked me my phone number and my name and which hospital was the nearest. I gave the info and added that the nearest hospital to deal with this kind of trauma was probably Klang.

At 1.57pm I received a call from the phone number 03- 3371 7989 - the ambulance control centre at the Klang Hospital. The guy in charge of the control centre asked to speak to me and asked for the location of the accident which I gave, adding that the victim was dying and that this was an extreme emergency.

The guy manning the control centre did not know my location, so I repeated it clearly and concisely. It seemed that he needed to understand it for himself otherwise he could not pass on the information and dispatch the ambulance. It was a frustrating conversation. I repeated the details of my location and he asked me if I was sure that Klang was the nearest hospital. I repeated firmly, yes.

I told him the injuries of the victim, hoping he would feel the urgency. Instead he wanted to know whether

‘dia jatuh motor ke...?’

I told him politely that his question was completely irrelevant and to hurry up with the ambulance. I had to hang up and attend to the victim. I called back at 2.06pm to ask if an ambulance had been dispatched. The same guy told me

‘belum’.

He asked me the same questions. I answered them.

I warned him that the next time I make a call would be to the menteri besar's office to complain about his shoddy professionalism, so he'd better send out that ambulance immediately. I then called someone I knew at 2.08pm who helped call the Klang Hospital on my behalf to request they send out an ambulance immediately.

I waited and called the emergency control centre at Klang Hospital at 2.36pm and asked the same guy if an ambulance had been dispatched. Same answer,

‘belum’.

He requested me to repeat the accident location again, which I did. This time I told him that he need not understand it but to just writes it down and give it to the ambulance driver along with my handphone number.

I waited again. The victim was rolling in pain on the road, his head had a gash about 10cm long on the back, and the skin on his head was beginning to peel off. His left leg was completely broken and was hanging by the flesh but the main artery was not severed. He was not losing much blood. His workmate was cradling him in his arms and asking him to

'mengucap kalimah syahadah’ .

I tried to stop further damage to his left leg by securing it to his right leg. I told the few people around that he is going to die if we don't get him to hospital. Everyone was reluctant to put him in their cars, all kinds of excuses, ‘ada barang, kotor lah, berdarah la’. Meanwhile the victim was grabbing on to my clothes and body in pain, unable to talk possibly due to his head injury.

Finally the driver who knocked him down allowed us to use his car to send the victim to the hospital. But he was too shaken-up to drive. Another gentleman offered to drive but did not know how to exit the Elite highway to get towards the Klang Hospital. I asked him to follow me and so we drove off as fast as we could head towards the Federal Highway to Klang. We had to go through so many toll gates, some after paying though some after explaining briefly, let us through.

On the Federal Highway despite our attempts to notify motorists that we were in a state of emergency, many blocked our path and only relented to give way when I practically sat on my car horn.

We arrived in Klang and I called the emergency control centre guy for directions to the hospital. I was by this time quite distressed and pronounced the name of the hospital wrongly. The guy in the control center told me there was no such hospital in Klang, so I said to him.

‘Have you sent out an ambulance to the Batu Tiga toll accident site? No, right? So since you cannot understand where the accident is, we are sending the victim to you. This is an emergency can you give me directions to your hospital or not?’

Finally he did. When we arrived at the Klang Hospital, I had a hard time looking for the staff to bring a trolley to remove the victim from the car. I asked for assistance from two nurses but did not receive a response. I took a trolley and pushed it to the car, suddenly a hospital aide appeared, then another, as we tried to remove the victim’s body from the car. It was then that the co-worker who had been cradling the victim in the car said that he had stopped breathing.

The hospital aides rushed the victim into the Accident & Emergency room and I followed. As he was wheeled in there was no immediate response from the doctors. It was obvious this young man with his whole life ahead of him had died in the car on the way to the hospital.
I was so angry, my words were simple,

‘Kecuaian pihak hospital menghantar ambulans membantu mangsa ini telah mengecewakan rakyat’.

The aide asked me to be calm. How could any human being be calm when faced with such stupidity and total lack of regard for human life? The aide showed me an identity card and asked me to confirm if this was the victim. I confirmed. I briefly saw the name Mohd Yusry and his age was somewhere in his mid-20s. As I walked away from the A&E room in disgust I saw the control centre. A guy was sitting in it with a female nurse looking at a computer (very close and comfy).

I approached him and asked if he was the person who took my calls, he knew my name and I asked him for his, he declined. I asked him why he did not dispatch an ambulance to which he replied something brash.

I asked him if he was happy as the victim was unnecessarily dead and that I am going to ensure that his lackadaisical attitude to his job was brought to the public attention. I asked him for his name again along with the nurse who was sitting next to him ‘playing’ with the computer. He refused to give it to me.

Feeling very frustrated I called my friend, who earlier helped route my call and informed him that regretfully the road accident victim - a young Malay man - had died in the car on the way to the hospital and that no ambulance had been dispatched.

This is not the first time I have called for an ambulance and used the 999 services. Every time I have called for an ambulance it has never arrived, never. Why? This is the first road accident victim whom I have helped who has actually died. Everyone else I have helped before this has survived.

The issues that need to be addressed are:

1. The strategic location of a free government hospital able to deal with serious road accident trauma in Shah Alam (densely populated area with much traffic activity). and/or Emergency response centres created where the Balai Bomba have special ambulances and police squad cars for dispatching only to accident/incident locations and to the nearest hospital/police stations (ambulances need not be parked permanently at hospitals).

2. Road signs giving clear and proper directions to hospitals (there are hardly any such signs now).

3. Special emergency exits through toll gates and signs declaring their existence plus a phone number to call ahead so that they can be opened.

4. The name of the highways such as Elite, Kesas, Federal Highway, etc, be clearly advertised so that road users are able to identify their locations under emergency circumstances.

5. Professionally trained personnel with various language skills who have true empathy and value for the human life manning emergency response centres. Who consistently answer calls on the first or second ring.

6. An emergency station located at the hospital emergency parking lot with a big sign above it (similar to the car jockey service at hotels) to receive patients. That is manned 24 hours a day and never ever left unattended.

7. An ISO response time from the time you send out an SOS call to 999 that will ensure you receive the assistance you need within 15 minutes.

These are my simple suggestions. Life is precious and should be preserved above all else. Without regard for one another what kind of country are we leaving for our children

Aku nak tambah .. mungkin kerajaan juga perlu mendidik anak-anak melihat nyawa sebagai sesuatu yg berharga.. pernah aku terbaca kat UK yg anak-anak dibawa melihat hospital .. masuk ke dalam ambulan utk memahami betapa kritikalnya menyelamatkan nyawa manusia. Pendidikan dari kecil boleh mendidik anak2 menghargai nyawa seseorang. Sebab adakalanya kita tidak akan memahami jika kita tidak pernah mengalaminya.

Wallahualam.. semoga Allah mencucuri rahmat roh pemuda yg meninggal dunia di atas. Aameein~~
SRi:Dalam masa-masa genting orang-orang politik nak hukum mati pembuang anak nie--tetiba arini boleh pula keluar lagi punya sadis cerita baby jumpa dalam lobang najis pula..isk3